The Grand Rapids Press
Wednesday, June 22, 2005

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Non-embryonic Stem Cells

It was heart wrenching to read about little 4-year-old Ellie Clark, diagnosed with juvenile diabetes, who doesn’t “ . . . want (needle) pokes any more” [Miss Clark Goes to Washington, PRESS, June 18.] Who can blame her? Unfortunately, I believe her planned emotional plea to the U.S. Senate for increased government funding for stem cell research could be misguided.

I sincerely hope there will be a breakthrough in stem cell therapy that could help Ellie Clark soon. However, it should be pointed out that there are two types of stem cells: embryonic and non-embryonic. Although the article didn’t specify the type of stem cell, it can be assumed Miss Clark will be lobbying for money for embryonic stem cell research.

Embryonic stem cells are obtained by creating human embryos through in-vitro fertilization so their stem cells can be removed, resulting in the death of these little humans. On the other hand, non-embryonic stem cells can be obtained from umbilical cord blood, bone marrow, and various organs in the human body. These cells have been generating a lot of excitement in the scientific field, much more so than embryonic ones.

Treatments and cures have already been observed from non-embryonic stem cells. They are currently in clinical trials to help patients with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s, Crohn’s, spinal cord injuries, blindness, diabetes, and other conditions.

In contrast, embryonic stem cells have yet to produce one cure. Scientists predict there probably won’t be any positive results from that research for decades, if ever. Let’s increase funding for stem cell research, but make sure it’s non-embryonic stem cell research where we are seeing amazing results, and not some questionable research that sacrifices human lives in the process.

Germaine Wensley, RN
Secretary, California Nurses for Ethical Standards
Middleville, MI

Relighting the Lamp